In his stream live videos, Nicolas Sourivongxay said something about getting insane with security concerns. Not only the police can get this kind of irrational thought but also the civil population.
What's the limit between security and freedom?
An example is thinking of what is impregnated in the collective unconscious about the disappeared people of the last de facto government in Argentina, specially promoted by some argentinian human rights organizations and centre-left political parties. And in this last point, it's remarkable the insanity in the society in Argentina. In 2015, Nicolas Sourivongxay wrote and published ten books, probably, a worldwide record in that year for just one writer. The first book of Nicolas was about his experiences of life, after that his way of writing changed mixing fantasy with reality by creating paralel countries and paralel worlds, so when Nicolas felt good his books turned to fantasy, when Nicolas felt bad he mixed reality with fantasy. The question is, WHY BOOKS WHEN THERE IS SOCIAL MEDIA? The revolution of social medias triggered words which were subject of taboo in the past. For goverments they are called "Conspirancy theories" but people have freedom of speech what is a human right. There are many examples to point out on social media regarding theories, on Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Blogs, Medium and so on. Why is a book so relevant for people when there are a lot words on the internet nowadays? and some words on social medias provoke more scandalous than books.
During a dictatorship, books were forbidden and freedom of expression was not well acceptable by governments like that. However, time changed the framework of the society even so, THERE ARE STILL PEOPLE LIVING IN THE PAST.
The mind of the society was accelerated so reading a book of 300 pages is considered a waste of time for many people. And that's why the Pandemic Covid-19 tried to pause or to reduce in speed the mind of people. In these last decades, just words on social medias are relevant and books are considered a peace of art.
In Buenos Aires, this behaviour of trying to ban story tellers is remarkable. Some of them say "que escriba filosofia", like saying that writing "philosophy" is a bad thing. For intellectual schollars that's a not a bad thing, writing philosophy is considered progress in a society. For politicians, "Philosophy", maybe ruin their plans. And owner of companies in capitalism system, they see "Philosophy" as comtemptously.
One another example Nicolas remembers about Security and Freedom is when he arguied with police officers, a policewoman said, "es por su seguridad". And there is a stigma for poor people by considering them dangerous, even when it is known, there can be thieves in every economic status, so in medium class and in upper class. Even so, the society believes that people in inferior conditions are prompt to steal and it's more visible in poor people the violence and the crimes.
Coming back to the point of "It's for your security", so polceofficers and civil people cyberspy, persecute, do harassment on the streets, provoke outages to cut freedom of expression on social medias or to stop hackers or cyberpies, also the cutting of internet connection to stop the increasing level of cyberspionage in a specific moment. The question is, where is the will of Nicolas Sourivongxay? What about his rights? There is a kind of projection from the inconscious.
Did Nicolas call 911? Why is Nicolas affected in bad manner if there is a legal investigation of hackers and cyberspies or street harassment? Why are they hurting the victim? Why in order to stop the bad activities, they hurt the victim as well? Why were the police officers and the civil population making decisions in his name? Once again, the question,"What about Nicolas' will?
How do you know bad things are going to happen to Nicolas on the streets? Were actions speaking louder than words or Words were speaking louder than actions? Rumors, gossiping, politics intentions, nationalism. And why did the police not stop during 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and in 2022 when Nicolas said "Stop!" on social media, by emails, and before the Court ?
The transition of the government of Cristina Kirchner to Mauricio Macri around 2015 almost ended up in a civil war, so there were a lot of police cars and the horns were sounding in everywhere. In another hand, the remain of that, there were people trying to avoid abuses from the police and/or with politics intentions. The police was not focused on him like in current levels. The Police persecution against Nicolas increased in 2018, so Nicolas mainly walked on the streets freely before that year And let's remember in 2020, Nicolas took his first vacation in Mar del Plata (Buenos Aires Province Coast) without police persecution but in 2021 he received police persecution, who gave the order? . A massive quantity of police officers obviously has a leader who gives an order beyond the iniciatives of police officers, the complicity of civil people with police officers, and fake police officers as Nicolas revealed in his claims.
Security concerns also ended up in increasing the level of cyberspionge made by the population in general including the people in the government and security forces who do that without feeling guilty, everytime Nicolas makes a claim to stop police persecution visible on social medias or by email. Why? the excuse is the collective incounscious from a dictatorship, the projection in their minds towards one main purpose of taking intellectual advantage of Nicolas, to steal ideas and knowledge, and manipulation. The peculiar thing is thinking irrationally that Nicolas needs witnesses as it is said before on his last book 'Braining Insania: The Spanglish book of Nicolas Sourivongxay", the word of a person is infected by the syndrome of Salomon Ash and they can lie. Words vs Actions. For other countries cyberspying, maybe it is for intellectual rights purposes or for other reasons.
USA,Aus, EU, ASIA, Brazil: https://amazon.com/s?i=digital-text&rh=p_27%3ANicolas+Sourivongxay&s=relevancerank&text=Nicolas+Sourivongxay&ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1
USA: http://bubok.com/authors/nico849
España: http://lnkd.in/e6WB8rZn
France: http://bubok.fr/auteurs/nico849
Portugal: http://bubok.pt/autores/nico849
Let's remember The 11 Concepts of Security created by Nicolas Sourivongxay
And let's remember the 13 Concepts of Justice created by Nicolas Sourivongxay
(1st part)
(2nd part)
And finally let's remember the crimes according to the law published on the article 'Penal Code" (Nicolas has no defense). Rights give Freedom, a person is subject of rights:
https://ethnicjustice.blogspot.com/2022/09/penal-code.html
ARGENTINE PENAL CODE:
http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/15000-19999/16546/texact.htm#19
SECOND BOOK, ON CRIMES, TITLE I
CRIMES AGAINST PEOPLE:
Art 84. Whoever INSTIGATES ANOTHER TO SUICIDE OR HELPES HIM TO COMMIT IT, if the suicide had been tempted or consummated, will be punished with imprisonment from one to four years.
TITLE II
CRIMES AGAINST HONOR: Arts. 109 to 117 bis
TITLE V
CRIMES AGAINST FREEDOM: Arts. 140 to 161
Art.141. It will be punished with imprisonment or imprisonment from six months to three years; who illegally deprives another of his personal liberty.
Art.142.
Paragraph 1. If the act is committed with violence or threats or for religious or revenge purposes.
Paragraph 2. If the act is committed in the person of an ascendant, a sibling, a spouse or another individual to whom particular respect is due
Paragraph 3. If there is serious damage to the person, health or business of the offended party, provided that the act does not matter another crime for which the law imposes a greater penalty.
Paragraph 4. If the act is committed simulating public authority or order of public authority.
Paragraph 5. If the deprivation of liberty lasts more than one month.
Paragraph 3 is due to the neck pain suffered by Nicolas due to psychological pressure when he walks on the streets because he must be in alert in case a police patrol car catches him, and due to the sustained persecution over time when he walked to and from his clients' houses in NSComex, his personal business. Nicolas left the market with NSComex in December 2021.
Paragraph 4 is because in the complaints made by Nicolas Sourivongxay, uniformed people without police identification appeared but they acted as security agents in the process of harassment during the journey of his departure, finding them on the streets or on public transport.
Article 142 bis. Imprisonment or confinement of five (5) to fifteen (15) years will be imposed, to whoever subtracts, retains or hides, a person with the purpose of forcing the victim or a third party, to do, not do, or tolerate something against your will. If the author achieves his purpose, the minimum sentence will rise to eight (8) years.
Paragraph 6. When three (3) or more people participate in the event.
Let's remember that Nicolas only has social networks to express the violations of his rights. The traditional media, press, television and radio, never gave him a voice for his defense.
In his social networks, the number of Likes he gets is very low, and most of the Views and Likes were made by him. How do people and authorities find out? They find out through cyber espionage. The concealment also causes Nicolas not to obtain the monetary benefits of social networks and internet platforms.
Let's remember that in Nicolas's house, he suffered momentary power outages as if they were threats, internet outages using the provider Telecentro SA, and cyber espionage of people close and not close.
Article 142 ter. Prison shall be imposed from TEN (10) to Twenty-five (25) years and absolute and perpetual disqualification for the exercise of any public function and for private security tasks, to the public official or to the person or member of a group of persons who, acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence of the State, in any way, will deprive one or more persons of their liberty, when this action is followed by a lack of information or a refusal to acknowledge said deprivation of liberty or to report on the whereabouts of the person.
Art 144 bis. Paragraph 1. The public official who, with abuse of his functions or without the formalities prescribed by law, deprives someone of his personal liberty.
TORTURE: Art. 144 ter. The public official who imposes any kind of torture on persons, legitimately or illegitimately, deprived of their liberty, shall be punished with imprisonment or imprisonment from eight to twenty-five years and absolute and perpetual disqualification.
DISCRIMINATION and EXCLUSION: Whoever leads a person outside the borders of the republic, with the purpose of illegally submitting him to the power of another or enlisting him in a foreign army, will be punished with imprisonment from two to six years.
CYBERESPIONAGE:
Violation of Secrets and Privacy:
Arts. 153. Anyone who opens or unduly opens an electronic communication, a letter, a sealed sheet, a telegraphic, telephone or other dispatch, which is not intended, will be punished with imprisonment from fifteen (15) days to six (6) months. managed; or unduly seizes an electronic communication, a letter, a statement, an office or other private paper, even if it is not sealed, or unduly suppresses or diverts from its destination a correspondence or electronic communication that is not addressed to him.
The same penalty shall be incurred by anyone who unduly intercepts or seizes electronic communications or telecommunications from any system of a private nature or restricted access.
Article 153 bis. It will be punished with imprisonment from fifteen (15) days to six (6) months, if it does not result in a more severely punished crime, whoever knowingly accesses by any means, without due authorization or exceeding the one he possesses, to a system or data restricted computer access.
The penalty will be from (1) month to one (1) year in prison when the access is detrimental to a computer system or data of a state public body or a provider of public services or financial services.
There are rumors on the streets about how much money Nicolas has in his bank account. They detect if Nicolas wrote any email, and so on.
The cyberespies, who no matter the economic condition in which they find themselves, that is, they can be found in humble neighborhoods, can access to information through devices such as cell phones and laptops. And certain policemen, they can also do it.
MOREOVER...
Rights violated: Work dependently (Exclusion from job market) & independently (Police persecution, low income, excess of cyberespionage), to Study at universities in person (includes Police persecution), to have Justice, Freedom of expression, Privacy, Walk on streets, Reunion, Better health...
Link: http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/45000-49999/48612/norma.htm
Habeas Corpus
Link: https://lpderecho.pe/vicios-voluntad-anibal-torres-vasquez/
+Error, fraud, violence and intimidation are traditionally called #vices of the will that harm the subjective conditions for a correct exercise of the autonomy of private will...
Link: https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Comp/Derechos/circulacion.html
+Article 14 of the Argentine National Constitution.- All the inhabitants of the Nation enjoy the following rights in accordance with the laws that regulate their exercise, namely: ...to enter, stay, transit and leave Argentine territory; ...
Link: http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/320000-324999/324490/norma.html
I) That the National Constitution protects the rights to intimacy and privacy -protected by articles 18, 19 and 75 paragraph 22, National Constitution (C.N.); art. 11 inc. 2nd and 21st paragraph 1 of the American Convention on Human Rights (A.C.D.H.); art. 17, paragraph 1 and 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (P.I.D.C.P.), art. 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (D.U.D.H.)-, and art. 52 and cc. of the Civil and Commercial Code of the Nation, guaranteeing a sphere of personal freedom excluded from the authority of state bodies.
III) That, as this Court has indicated, the protection of the area of privacy is one of the most precious values of respect for the dignity of the human being and an essential feature of differentiation between the rule of law and authoritarian forms of government (arg. “ALITT”, Rulings: 329:5266, among others).
IV) That the right to privacy and the consequent guarantee against their injury act against any arbitrary or abusive “interference” or “interference” in the private life of those affected (conf. art. 75, sub. 22, of the National Constitution ; art.12 of the U.D.H.R.; art. 11, subsection 2, C.A.D.H., and 17 subsection 2 P.I.D.C.P.).
VIII) The furtive obtaining of personal data or sensitive information that is not based on a judicial investigation, the preparation of merely “preventive” records, the disclosure, trafficking or trade of the data obtained based on an originally lawful purpose, the threat or The blackmail derived from the possession of intimate data that is not conducive to the clarification of a crime, must not only be prevented and punished by law and subsequent jurisprudence, but must deserve the maximum social repudiation, since they constitute an attack on the public trust.
The right to privacy is the right of the individual to have a secret sphere of life, from which he has the power to keep others away.
The right to honor, protected by criminal law, is given by the consideration that third parties profess towards a certain person and by the person's self-esteem towards himself.
The right to one's own image consists of the right of every person that their image is not captured or reproduced by any means.
Ethnic Justice
