There is a dispute for the ownership of the famous phrase "Actions speak louder than words". Religion sites say the quote is attributed to St. Anthony of Padua in the 1200s without evidence, other people say it was declared by the english puritan clergyman, Thomas Manton in 1693, other say the phrase was published as exactly we know in 1736 in “The Melancholy State of Province,” a collection of letters, an unknown gentleman pens the following,“Actions speak louder than words and are more to be regarded.”, other say it was written by the american writer Mark Twain, and finally many people say the quote was pronounced by the american president Abrahan Lincoln in 1856 for the first time.
The most important thing is to understand that phrase and there were a lot of examples indicated by Nicolas Sourivongxay during the police persecution. Many police officers said in words they were not following Nicolas, but their actions matter. They turned their heads down pretending watching their own cellphones when in fact they were positionated in a specific place to follow the path of Nicolas on the streets.
Let's remember the relevant event when Nicolas argued with the police.
CASE Nr. 1
April 17th, 2022. That day was the first time Nicolas talked to the police officers.
Before the first meet there were many police cars following Nicolas, he went out of a famous american Fast Food one block and a half from there. If you check the dialogue and what Nicolas expressed on his email, at the first meet, you gotta find that a police women officer called him contemptuously "Chino"(Chinese), police cars intimidated him to push him to leave from that corner. Nicolas was sending emails to authorities in that corner. During the dialogue, one of the police officers wanted to know what he was doing in that corner. Why did the police officer want to know that? Is that a cause to suspect of any crime or he was just asking for the purpose of gossiping out of this labors? At the end of the argument, they really wanted Nicolas to move away from that corner, but Nicolas stayed in that place and continued sending emails to authorities. They left the place. Watch the camera live: https://www.facebook.com/100074240827280/videos/359351546140092 .
Seemed like Police officers agreed to talk to him the same day. It never happened days, months and years before. Nicolas was walking on the street Ramon Santamarina with camera live. A car of the police persecuted him just a few meters from Ramon Santamarina until reaching him before a Kiosko. The Police officer told Nicolas some women claimed he was filming their store so they called 911. That question revealed the Police officer was lying. Here it is last camera live: https://www.facebook.com/100074240827280/videos/517827626733648 . And why would those women call 911 if they had a car of the police in front of their store? . The policeman asked if Nicolas was inside the store when filming, but Nicolas was outside when filming, so that's another lie of the policeman. There were other young people on the streets and they looked like poor and dangerous, they didn't look like Nicolas in appearance, why was the police not persecuting them instead?, Nicolas asked, but the police officer got in shock with that question. And the policeman asked him a kind of male question that only men know the implicit language 'Do you have a problem with the police?', of course, Nicolas answered that question wisely. And her companion policewoman said 'es por su seguridad' (it's for your security), so Nicolas told them that IF HE NEEDED HELP, HE WOULD CALL 911 FOR SECURITY, SO THAT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SEND HIM THE POLICE WITHOUT HIS CONSENT. Camera live: https://www.facebook.com/100074240827280/videos/470910484825054 . Moreover, the policeman only considered physical violence as violence, but not psychological violence. They left the place. Check the date April 17th 2022 for more details on the blog: https://justiciapornicolasourivongxay.blogspot.com/2020/06/policia.html
CASE Nr. 2
In this case the police car and the car of the Municipality of Esteban Echeverria parked over one street, camara live: https://www.facebook.com/100074240827280/videos/1850088432002513 . A few minutes later, the two cars followed Nicolas until the street near the train station, so Nicolas asked them if they followed him, however they denied the action, watch the camera live: https://www.facebook.com/100074240827280/videos/596984131767528 . And in the same stream live video, timeline 4:00 to 4:20, you can see that the car of the Municipality of Esteban Echeverria appeared for the third time. Check the date June 22th 2022 for more details on the blog: https://justiciapornicolasourivongxay.blogspot.com/2020/06/policia.html
CASE Nr. 3
Here it is an example of an employee of the national train company in Buenos Aires Province doing harassment by actions so he denied that in words: https://www.facebook.com/100074240827280/videos/556412046027819 . Check the dates June 24th 2022 and June 26th, 2022 for more details on the blog: https://justiciapornicolasourivongxay.blogspot.com/2020/06/policia.html
CASE Nr. 4
And one more remarkable event concerning racial and refugee discrimination occured this month on September 1st, 2022 when Nicolas was at a famous american fast food at the Argentina Ezeiza International Airport. The man in the photo belongs to Migration Sector at the Airtport. There were many seats free in that store even so, he chose a seat in front of Nicolas. When he finished having his coffee, he saw policemen officers dressed in black, and one polce woman with orange jacket trying to order her meal using screen touch. Later, Nicolas went to a famous american coffee store in front of that fast food. Another police woman with orange jacket suddenly appeared and she stayed there watching the fast food while Nicolas asking for his Reward Card in that coffee store. The rest of police officers had gone.
When he left that place, outside, other police officers continued with the harassment.
HABEAS CORPUS
Let's remember Habeas Corpus was rejected by the Argentina, Buenos Aires Province, Lomas de Zamora's Court on April 27th, 2022. Check: https://justiciapornicolasourivongxay.blogspot.com/2020/06/policia.html
SOME AUTHORITIES ON TWITTER
Other things to point out are that the disctrict attorney's office and the governor of Buenos Aires province blocked Nicolas Sourivongxay's Twitter account because of the quantity of comments on their accounts.
RIGHTS AFFECTED
My Rights violated: to have Justice, Freedom of expression, Privacy, Walk on streets, Reunion...
Link: http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/45000-49999/48612/norma.htm
Habeas Corpus
Link: https://lpderecho.pe/vicios-voluntad-anibal-torres-vasquez/
+Error, fraud, violence and intimidation are traditionally called #vices of the will that harm the subjective conditions for a correct exercise of the autonomy of private will...
Link: https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Comp/Derechos/circulacion.html
+Article 14 of the Argentine National Constitution.- All the inhabitants of the Nation enjoy the following rights in accordance with the laws that regulate their exercise, namely: ...to enter, stay, transit and leave Argentine territory; ...
Link: http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/320000-324999/324490/norma.html
I) That the National Constitution protects the rights to intimacy and privacy -protected by articles 18, 19 and 75 paragraph 22, National Constitution (C.N.); art. 11 inc. 2nd and 21st paragraph 1 of the American Convention on Human Rights (A.C.D.H.); art. 17, paragraph 1 and 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (P.I.D.C.P.), art. 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (D.U.D.H.)-, and art. 52 and cc. of the Civil and Commercial Code of the Nation, guaranteeing a sphere of personal freedom excluded from the authority of state bodies.
III) That, as this Court has indicated, the protection of the area of privacy is one of the most precious values of respect for the dignity of the human being and an essential feature of differentiation between the rule of law and authoritarian forms of government (arg. “ALITT”, Rulings: 329:5266, among others).
IV) That the right to privacy and the consequent guarantee against their injury act against any arbitrary or abusive “interference” or “interference” in the private life of those affected (conf. art. 75, sub. 22, of the National Constitution ; art.12 of the U.D.H.R.; art. 11, subsection 2, C.A.D.H., and 17 subsection 2 P.I.D.C.P.).
VIII) The furtive obtaining of personal data or sensitive information that is not based on a judicial investigation, the preparation of merely “preventive” records, the disclosure, trafficking or trade of the data obtained based on an originally lawful purpose, the threat or The blackmail derived from the possession of intimate data that is not conducive to the clarification of a crime, must not only be prevented and punished by law and subsequent jurisprudence, but must deserve the maximum social repudiation, since they constitute an attack on the public trust.
The right to privacy is the right of the individual to have a secret sphere of life, from which he has the power to keep others away.
The right to honor, protected by criminal law, is given by the consideration that third parties profess towards a certain person and by the person's self-esteem towards himself.
The right to one's own image consists of the right of every person that their image is not captured or reproduced by any means.
Source:
https://english-grammar-lessons.com/actions-speak-louder-than-words-meaning/
https://grammarist.com/proverb/actions-speak-louder-than-words/
https://www.quora.com/When-did-Abraham-Lincoln-say-actions-speak-louder-than-words
https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/actions-speak-louder-than-words.html
No comments:
Post a Comment